Enjoying The Son of Man

Posted by Michael Dewalt on April 22nd, 2010

John 1:51 And he said to him, “Truly, truly, I say to you, you will see heaven opened, and the angels of God ascending and descending on the Son of Man.”

John 3:13-15 No one has ascended into heaven except he who descended from heaven, the Son of Man. And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, so must the Son of Man be lifted up, that whoever believes in him may have eternal life.

Christ referred to Himself as the “Son of Man” so that He could relate with man. For the believer this is to be seen, as Christ showed Himself fully as the Man who would redeem mankind.

Jesus Christ referred to Himself with this title, “Son of Man,” very often. The way that Christ used it is of importance to understanding why He did so, and how it relates to mankind – particularly believers. A title such as “Son of Man” would have never been used by anyone at His time; so in using it, Christ showed His pre-eminence above all mankind in being The Man. It is important to make mention that the only instance of an individual making this claim in the New Testament besides Christ Himself, is in Acts 7:56 where Stephen says, “‘Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God.’” One often wonders here at Jesus Christ Himself when He stated in Luke 12:8, “And I tell you, everyone who acknowledges me before men, the Son of Man also will acknowledge before the angels of God.” Stephen would have known these words of Christ to the Sanhedrin. It is a wonderful picture that he would have went home to, seeing Jesus Christ standing at the right hand of God in the heavens.

For the believer it is significant to see how Christ made this claim, and in what senses it related to the believers of His day, and for the believer today. First, this claim was always and only used to refer to Himself. When Christ uses the term “Son of Man,” it is often used to mean “I” so that He could relate with the culture of the time. An example of this is found in Luke 9:35, where Christ says to His disciples, “And Jesus said to him, ‘Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head.’”

Another way that Christ used this term was in emphasizing the importance of His full humanity, in that He would have to suffer and be put to death. The term “Son of Man,” used by the former Prophets speaking to the suffering aspect of the Messiah, was commonly used, but may not have been fully understood by the disciples at this time. Here Jesus Christ reveals exactly what it means: that the Son of Man would suffer – when in Mark 8:31 He states, “And he began to teach them that the Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected by the elders and the chief priests and the scribes and be killed, and after three days rise again.” Such a claim would have brought much enlightenment to the disciples in what was about to happen in fulfillment of the Scriptures.

Lastly, the way in which Christ referred to Himself by the term “Son of Man” was a claim to authority that He had upon creation, showing His superiority over all things, and being the absolute truth. The Son of Man had full domain over all things, unlike common mankind. This term, then, was to show that Christ is The Man, over all things.

How great to see how important it is for Christ to reveal Himself to mankind, so that He could save mankind. The fact that Jesus Christ claimed Himself as one like mankind shows us the relationship that He had with His disciples, and has with His fellow brethren. The believer can boast in the fact that this title shows that He came to fulfill the scriptures in that the Son of Man was to suffer for them. To boast in the One who not only made a way to relate with the believer and suffer for the believer, but also to relate Himself like that of man, gives more of a reality to the suffering that He truly took on for His people. As believers, we must boast in the truth that Christ lowered Himself to be called “Son of Man.” But moreover, boast in The Man who is to be lifted high among all men for His suffering; and given dominion over all things, and is to be praised and thanked.

Top 15 Books on the Cross

Posted by Nicholas T. Batzig on June 3rd, 2009

For quite a while now I have wanted to publish a list of what I believe to be the 15 most beneficial books on the cross. This list does not include all of the various Systematic Theologies, such as Calvin’s Institutes, which include sections on Christology or the atonement. There are, of course, many Puritan works that deal with the atonement and the Person and work of Christ. This is a list of the particular individual volumes I have benefited from most:

#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
#13
#14
#15

Editors Note: I am ashamed to admit that I forgot about this book. Thanks to Josh Walker for making me painfully aware of this unbelievable oversight. So I guess its top 16 now!

Vern Poythress Audio

Posted by Nicholas T. Batzig on June 1st, 2009

Thanks to James Grant for pointing out these lectures. You will find numerous class lectures, lectures on books of the Bible and Sunday School lessons there. The Sunday school lectures look particularly interesting. I think you will find Dr. Poythress to be a brilliant theological with many thoughts that will help set you off on deeper theological investigation.

Calvin on Romans 2:13

Posted by Nicholas T. Batzig on May 30th, 2009

I have edited this post from it’s original form. I want to be exceedingly careful in what I say about subjects in which I have a formed opinion, but that need to be refined through more study. I hope that this quote from Calvin on Romans 2:13 will suffice as an explanation of my defense of Rick Phillip’s interpretation of it here. Commenting on Romans 2:13, Calvin wrote:

For the hearers of the law, etc. This anticipates an objection which the Jews might have adduced. As they had heard that the law was the rule of righteousness, (Deuteronomy 4:1 ) they gloried in the mere knowledge of it: to obviate this mistake, he declares that the hearing of the law or any knowledge of it is of no such consequence, that any one should on that account lay claim to righteousness, but that works must be produced, according to this saying, “He who will do these shall live in them.” The import then of this verse is the following, — “That if righteousness be sought from the law, the law must be fulfilled; for the righteousness of the law consists in the perfection of works.” They who pervert this passage for the purpose of building up justification by works, deserve most fully to be laughed at even by children. It is therefore improper and beyond what is needful, to introduce here a long discussion on the subject, with the view of exposing so futile a sophistry: for the Apostle only urges here on the Jews what he had mentioned, the decision of the law, — That by the law they could not be justified, except they fulfilled the law, that if they transgressed it, a curse was instantly pronounced on them. Now we do not deny but that perfect righteousness is prescribed in the law: but as all are convicted of transgression, we say that another righteousness must be sought. Still more, we can prove from this passage that no one is justified by works; for if they alone are justified by the law who fulfill the law, it follows that no one is justified; for no one can be found who can boast of having fulfilled the law.

, , ,

There is an interesting structure to the book of Galatians. Paul is, of course, writing this letter because of the threat of the Judaizers who came in to spy out the liberty of the Christians. The Judaizers were saying that one needed Christ and law-keeping (as represented by circumcision) to be accepted by God. The apostle Paul, as you well know, would not tolerate this perversion of the Gospel for even one minute. Therefore, in his defense of the Gospel and it implications he draws several contrasts. They are as follows:

Chapter 2 : Faith not Works

Chapter 3 : Promise (Gospel) not Law

Chapter 4 : Sons not Slaves

Chapters 5 and 6 : Spirit not Flesh

The logical connection between these contrasting principles forms the basis for the argument of the epistle. If one is to be justified (accepted by God as righteous) it must be by faith, not by works. The reason for this is the difference between the promise and the law. Once someone has been justified by faith he has been adopted into God’s family–he is a son of God, not a slave. The freedom that we have by faith in Christ, that makes us sons, is not a freedom to live in the flesh (i.e. the sinful, natural, unconverted lifestyle). We are given the Spirit when we believe and we are called to walk in the Spirit. Chapter 5 is most properly a discourse on the agency and nature of sanctification. If we are in the Spirit our lives will reflect “faith working through love.” The context is not about how we are accepted by God, but how we live once we have been given the liberty of the sons of God. Understanding the contrasting principles of Galatians is the most important thing we can know.

2009 Next Conference Audio

Posted by Nicholas T. Batzig on May 27th, 2009

I can’t tell you how many times I have heard someone in the church warn against proof texting. Proof-texting, of course, is that method of defending theological truth by means of appeal to one particular verse of the Bible. I readily admit that often proof-texting is abused and used to draw faulty conclusions. This is most evident in the false teaching of the cults and heretical sects of Christianity–specifically with regard to their doctrine of God, Christ, man and salvation. Within orthodox Christianity, it is seen in the realm of eschatology and ecclesiology.

But is all proof-texting wrong? I wonder if there hasn’t been an over reaction to the abhorrent theology of the cults and sects, and to the aberrations of sound theology in the dispensationalist and postmillennial camps of Christendom. Everyone practices proof-texting of some kind, and it is entirely right to do so. The Apostle Paul did it relentlessly. One only has to consider his method of defending justification by faith alone in Galatians 3, or his explanation of individual, eternal election in Romans 9, or his eschatology in 1 Corinthians 15. In fact, it could be argued that Paul defends every doctrine of Scripture by proof-texting from the Old Testament. The use of the OT in the NT is a systematic application of contextual proof-texting. So what is the principle that needs to be established before we can practice a biblical proof-texting? This answers to this question could fill, and have filled, volumes. It seems, however, that a very basic answer can be given based on discussions of exegesis being governed by systematic and biblical theology.
(more…)

The following messages were given by Sinclair Ferguson at the 2004 BASICS Conference:

His Sufficient Word – 2 Tim. 3

His Eternal Election - Ephesians 1

His Transforming Spirit - Romans 8

Here is the most recent article Paul Helm has posted on his blog. It is typical, insightful (and on this occasion, sarcastic) Helm on Christianity and culture.

Camden Bucey, Jeff Waddington, Jim Cassidy, and I began interviewing theologians and pastors back in June 2008. Interviewing these men has been an enormous blessing. We have learned a lot and had a great time in the process. Below you will find an index that will be updated from time to time. Thanks for listening:

Lane Tipton “The Theological Contributions of Richard Gaffin”
Lane Keister “The Federal Vision”
Gary Johnson Reforming or Conforming
Drew Dinardo Reformed Church Growth
Mark Garcia Union with Christ and Two-Fold Grace
R. Scott Clark Recovering the Reformed Confessions
J. Ligon Duncan The Westminster Confession into the 21st Century
Derek Thomas “The Pastor and the Academy”
Rick Phillips “Cultural Relevance, Mercy Ministry and the Social Gospel”
Jeff Jue “The Eschatology of the Westminster Divines”
D.G. Hart “J. Gresham Machen”
Martin Downes “The Emergent Church and Cultural Captivity”
Greg Reynolds “Preaching in an Electronic Age”
David Hall “The Calvin Quincentenary”
Scott Oliphant The Defense of the Faith
Ron Gleason Herman Bavinck
John Fesko The Reformed Doctrine of Justification
John Carrick The Preaching of Jonathan Edwards
Russel Moore Christ’s Kingdom: Gospel Priorities and Politics
John Muether Cornelius Van Til: A Life
Carl Trueman “A Brief History of Trinitarian Thought”
Stephen J. Nichols Getting the Blues
James White Apologetics and Islam
Peter Lillback Calvin and the Development of Covenant Theology
Phillip G. Ryken Thomas Boston: Preacher of the Fourfold State
D.G. Hart Deconstructing Evangelicalism
Stephen J. Nichols Jesus Made in America
Lane Tipton Van Til’s Trinitarian Theology
Highlights from 2008
Jim Cassidy Reformed Catechesis and the Ordinary Means of Grace
Vern Poythress Redeeming Science
William Dennison The Young Bultmann
G.K. Beale The Erosion of Inerrancy
Dave Garner The Eschatology of Adoption
Cornelius P. Venema Peadocommunion
Richard B. Gaffin Sanctification and the Gospel
Guy Waters N.T. Wright’s Doctrine of Justification #1
Guy Waters N.T. Wright’s Doctrine of Justification #2
T. David Gordon Why Johnny Can’t Preach
Michael Haykin The Church Fathers
James T. O’Brien Puritan Theology
Danny Olinger Geerhardus Vos
R. Fowler White and Keith Mathison The Unfolding of Biblical Eschatology
Michael Horton Christless Christianity
Douglas Kelly Systematic Theology: vol. 1 The Holy Trinity
Iain D. Campbell “The Song of David’s Son”
Jon D. Payne In the Splendor of Holiness
Eric J. Alexander A Life in the Preaching Ministry

Dr. Jon Payne, minister of Grace Presbyterian Church in Douglasville, Ga, has been bringing in excellent preachers and speakers for the past 5 years for their Reformation Heritage Conference. In 2004, Derek Thomas came and gave a series of lectures on Calvin, Geneva and Reformed Worship. Darryl Hart spoke in 2005 on American Reformation Heritage. Iain Murray came in 2006 and spoke on The Scottish Reformation. In 2007 Carl Trueman spoke on the German Reformation; and in 2008 Michael Horton gave a series of lectures on the Reformation and the Means of Grace.

Upcoming Conference speakers include Paul Jones, Joel Beeke, and Carl Trueman. Jones will be speaking on “The Music of the Protestant Reformation” in 2009. Dr. Beeke will be lecturing on “The Dutch Reformation” in 2010; and Dr. Trueman will focus on”The English Reformation.”

This really is a well thought out Conference. There are not many Conferences that focus on a nation by nation contribution to the Reformation. If you are not familiar with Dr. Jon Payne, I want to encourage you to look out for the forthcoming Christ the Center episode where I talk with Jon about Reformed Worship. Jon has authored two books : John Owen on the Lord’s Supper and In the Splendor of Holiness .

I had the enormous privilege of sitting down with Dr. Douglas Kelly, Professor of Systematic Theology at Reformed Theological Seminary in Charlotte, NC at the Twin Lakes Fellowship to get an interview for Christ the Center. The first volume of Dr. Kelly’s Systematic Theology has been published by Christian Focus. I was able to talk with Dr. Kelly about various aspects of the doctrine of the Trinity. You can listen to the Christ the Center episode here.

Not long after Twin Lakes, I was speaking with my mother (who greatly appreciates Dr. Kelly’s preaching and teaching ministry) about the interview. She gave me a sermon tape of a message Dr. Kelly gave at the dedication of Golden Isles Presbyterian Church on St. Simon’s Island, Ga (The church I went to as a teenager). There is a note of interest in Rev. Al Baker’s introduction of Dr. Kelly. The message was delivered in 1997. Al mentions the fact that Dr. Kelly was just about to take a sabbatical to work on a new book–his Systematic Theology. You can listen to this message here.

At Caesarea Philippi, Jesus asked His disciples two questions (Matthew 16:13-17). The first was, “Who do men say that I, the Son of Man, am?” The second was, “But who do you say that I am?” The disciples wasted no time in answering the first: “Some say John the Baptist, some Elijah, but still others, Jeremiah or one of the old prophets.” This is a striking answer on many levels. The people thought very highly of Jesus. They did not curse Him at this point. They did not spit in His face yet. But the answers they gave fell short, very short, of the true honor that He deserves. John H. Skilton once wrote:

According to the report of the disciples…some were saying that Jesus was John the Baptist. Those who expressed this view may have thought that they were paying Jesus a very high tribute indeed. John was the promised forerunner of the Messiah; he was a man, a messenger sent from God, (John 1:6); and he had been filled with the Holy Spirit from his mother’s womb (Luke 1:15). Prophecy had been revived in him, the word of God came to him (Luke 3:2); in the spirit and power of Elijah, as had been said, he went before the Lord, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just, to make ready a people prepared for the Lord (Luke 1:17). Jerusalem and all Judea and all the region round about the Jordan had gone out to him and been baptized in the river Jordan, confessing their sins (Matt. 3:5-6). Jesus Himself, in fulfilling all righteousness for His people, had come to John for baptism (Matt. 3:13-15). He had testified of John “Among them that are born of women there has not arisen a greater than John the Baptist…

John, however, was now dead. To hold that Jesus was John the Baptist, in the sense that seems to be intended here (cf . Mark 6:14-16; Matthew 14:2; Luke 9:7-9), would be to regard him as risen from the dead–and risen, probably, to bring in the day of the Lord. This was a high view of Jesus, and its advocates thought that it did justice to the special revelation that God had given. But this view did not meet with our Lord’s approval. It did not confess the truth about Him. It would seek to honor Him by identifying Him with a forerunner of the Messiah and not with the Messiah Himself. It did not represent saving, Christian faith.

(more…)

Here are some lectures, by Dr. T. David Gordon, on Reformed Worship in an electronic age. I remember that Dr. Pipa recommended an unpublished article by Dr. Gordon on the subject of Reformed Worship during our Reformed Worship course at GPTS. This is something that needs to be considered carefully, especially by church planters.

Greg Reynolds also has some interesting thoughts on the dynamics of the work of the church in a media age. You can listen to his lectures here .

Christ the Center interviewed Dr. Reynolds on preaching in an electronic age. You can listen to that interview here .

Along the same lines, here is the lecture that Dr. Reynolds gave at the 2007 GPTS Spring Theology Conference. The title of the talk was “Print and Pixels: How They Mediate Our Worldview.”

William Still on Truth in Love

Posted by Nicholas T. Batzig on January 25th, 2009

Here is a link to an article by the late Rev. William Still on speaking the truth in love. You will find the article published on page 27. Simply scroll down .

Editor’s Note: I do not necessarily agree with all of the arguments in this article.

Some Background on Roe vs. Wade

Posted by Nicholas T. Batzig on January 22nd, 2009

Justin Taylor has posted a link with some very helpful background on Roe vs. Wade. I was particularly surprised by the facts! You can read it here.

Updated Video

In his famous sermon Glorying in the Cross of Christ, John McLaurin has a magnificent section in which he contrast the humiliation and the glory of Jesus. He wrote:
His birth was mean on earth below. But it was celebrated by Hallelujahs by the heavenly host in the air above; He had a poor londging, but a star [brought visitors] to it from distant countries. Never [did] a Prince have such [visitors] so conducted. He had not the magnificent equipage that other kings have, but He was attended with multitudes of patients, seeking, and obtaining healing of soul and body; that was more true greatness than if He had been attended by crowds of Princes. He made the dumb that attended Him to sing His praises, and the lame to leap for joy, the deaf to hear His wonders, and the blind to see His glory. He had no guard of soldiers, nor magnificent retinue of servants, but the Centurion who had both, acknowledged that heath and sickness, life and death, took orders from Him: even the winds and storms, which no earthly power can control, obeyed Him; and death and the grave dare not refuse to deliver up their prey when He demanded it. He did not walk upon tapestry, but when He walked upon the sea the waters supported Him. All parts of creation, excepting sinful men, honored Him as their Creator. He kept no treasure but when He had occasion for money, the sea sent it to Him in the mouth of a fish. He had no barns or cornfields, but when He inclined to make a feast, a few loaves covered a sufficient table for many thousands. None of all the monarchs of the world gave such an entertainment. –By these and many such things, the Redeemer’s glory shone through His meanness, in the several parts of His life.1

John McLaurin, Eight Sermons on Some of the Most Important Subjects (Glasgow: Printed by William Smith, 1782) pp. 62-63

Consider Him!

Posted by Nicholas T. Batzig on December 26th, 2008

The amazing thing about Scripture is that it provides so much comfort and instruction by way of example. When Christians are put through trials, or called to suffer, they are not alone. This is one of the primary reasons the writer of Hebrews wrote about the cloud of witnesses in Hebrews 11. We so often think about Hebrews 11 as the chapter that commends faith that leads to obedience. And while this is certainly true, the entire context is one of testing and trials and obstacles in which faith is to be exercised. After reminding his readers of all the great men and women of faith, who exercised faith in the midst of these extreme trials and situations (trials so great that it appeared as though everything was against them and the fulfillment of God’s promises–as in the case of Abraham offering up Isaac), the author of Hebrews adds:

the time would fail to tell of Gideon, Barak, Samson and Jephthah, of David and Samuel and the prophets–who through faith conquered kingdoms, enforced justice, obtained promises, stopped the mouths of lions, quenched the power of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, were made strong out of weakness, became mighty in war, put foreign armies to flight. Women received their dead by resurrection. Some were tortured, refusing to accept release, so that they might rise again to a better life. Others suffered mocking and flogging, and even chains and imprisonment.

Here is a list of several OT saints who were tested, tried or persecuted, and yet, who persevered in faith:

Abel was killed by his brother because he worshiped God in truth.

Jacob spent half his life fleeing from his brother, and then had his favorite son taken from him.

Joseph was thrown in a well and sold into slavery by his own brothers.

Moses chose the reproach of Christ rather than the passing treasures of Egypt. He faced the anger of the most powerful man in the world without fear. He was also put to the test by a complaining church of 2 million people in the wilderness for forty years.

Hannah was mocked by her husband’s other wife because she was barren.

David stayed alive by fleeing from Saul for many, many years. David also fled from his own son, Absalom, who spent many years trying to kill him.

Daniel was thrown into a lions den for his faithfulness to the LORD.

Shadrach, Meshach, and Adednego were thrown into a fiery furnace for their faithful to the LORD.

Jeremiah was put in a pit for preaching the truth.

Zechariah was killed by the alter of God.

But the greatest example of righteous suffering was, of course, our Lord Jesus Christ. He, unlike all the men and women mentioned in Hebrews 11, was sinless. This is precisely why they are commended for looking to Him by faith. This is why they were righteous sufferers. And, contrary to the idea that the life of Jesus was simply an example to follow, we learn that we are to look to Him by faith in the midst of our trials and temptations–because He has redeemed us. There is, however, a very real sense in which He is the supreme example of suffering and endurance. We see this as we transition from Hebrews 11 to Hebrews 12. There, at the beginning of chapter 12 were are reminded that Jesus “for the joy set before Him, endured the cross, despising the shame, and has sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high.” It was all the wrong He suffered at the hands of sinners (even from sinners in the OT church), and for our salvation, that provides us with the strength to follow Him. We are to remember Him when we are wronged and spitefully treated. We are to look to Him who will one day judge the living and the dead.

There are many helpful books on suffering, trials and temptations but I would simply like to mention a few here:

John Piper and Justin Taylor’s Suffering and the Sovereignty of God. A free PDF version of this book can be found here.

James W. Bruce III’s From Grief to Glory. James Bruce also has a nice blog here.

Sinclair Ferguson’s Deserted By God.

William Henry Green’s Conflict and Triumph.

Did Jesus act at one time in His human nature and at another in His Divine? Is this the way we can reconcile the words of and about our Lord in the Gospels when they seem to contradict one or the other essential attributes of the human or Divine nature? Paul Helm seeks to give (or you might say ‘not to give’) an answer to this all important question. You can read his thoughts here.
RTS has an annual John Reed Miller Lecture Series. In 2005 they hosted Sinclair Ferguson. Dr. Ferguson gave a series of lectures on preaching Christ and preaching the Gospel. The lectures he delivered were:

Preaching Christ
Reaching Our Standards
Using our Grids

Paul Helm has a new post out for December entitled “Incomprehensibility Made Man.” In typical Helm-like fashion it is a philosophical meditation–this time, on the Incarnation of the Son of God.

I recently found this short work by Sinclair Ferguson on preaching Christ from the Old Testament. It is really quite helpful.

Stuart Robinson on Genesis 3:15

Posted by Nicholas T. Batzig on October 15th, 2008
As I was preparing a message for this Sunday morning I remembered something the great, biblical-theological Southern Presbyterian, Stuart Robinson, had outlined in eight points in Discourses of Redemption. Focusing on the significance of God’s curse on the serpent, Robinson explained:

1) The Redeemer would be a man (i.e. the seed of the woman)
2) The Redeemer would be more than a man (i.e. He would be Divine) because He would conquer the one who conquered man (i.e. the devil)
3) The Redeemer would represent a people.
4) The Redeemer would gather a collective group of redeemed individuals to Himself (this is seen in the use of the word ‘seed’ in Scripture. Christ is the “Seed” of the woman, and we are the ‘seed’ of the woman in Him.) This was the beginning of the visible church on earth. There would be a corporate nature of the redeemed.
5) Redemption would involve a new nature. Before this promise men were all hopelessly lost in sin. Man had made himself a slave of sin and Satan, and accordingly had a fallen, corrupt nature. In order for there to be enmity between the seed of the serpent and the seed of the woman, those who would become the seed of the woman would necessarily have to have a different nature.
6) It would be the gracious work of God in giving His people a new nature.
7) The Lord would put the enmity between the devil and those in his kingdom and Christ and those in His Kingdom.
8) The Redeemer would die a vicarious death on behalf of His people. (i.e. His heal would be bruised, not for anything that He had done but because of the sin of others).

The only thing I would add to all this is the fact that God did not require anything of His people except faith in His promise. This first preaching of the Gospel shows that salvation is ALL the work of God and ALL the work of grace. Man contributes nothing to it.

Blog Posts of Interest

Posted by Nicholas T. Batzig on September 27th, 2008

James Grant, Jr., over at In Light of Gospel, has gathered and posted some helpful blog posts over the last week:

How Much Christ in the Old Testament (Check out some of James’ articles linked on this post!)
Blogging, Vlogging, and Podcasting for Christ
Poythress on Guilt
Ferguson’s Message @ the DG Conference

Dale Ralph Davis MP3s and Resources

Posted by Nicholas T. Batzig on September 19th, 2008

Here is the link to sermons that Dale Ralph Davis preached during his time (1988-1993) at Aisquith Presbyterian Church in Parkville, MD . Currently, Rev. Davis is the Pastor of Woodland Presbyterian Church in Hattiesburg, MS. You can find his recent sermons here. Dr. Davis is also well known for his Old Testament Commentaries, published in the Christian Focus series. The set includes his commentary on Joshua, Judges, 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings, and 2 Kings. I would also recommend this book for any preacher of the Gospel.

I have wanted to post something for a while on the section of Geerhardus Vos’ Biblical Theology, at the beginning of his chapter on New Testament Revelation, in which he explains the development of the New Testament in terms of Jesus preaching the facts of His atoning death on the cross, and glorious resurrection from the dead, and the Apostles interpreting those facts. My good friend Steve Shanley has explained the gist of Vos’ argument in the following manner:
Vos argues for the unity of OT revelation to Christ’s words and especially his works, and then argues for the organic unity to the Apostles that follow him to interpret his works after being completed, which is why the Spirit was given to the Apostles in a special revelatory way (John 16). The Scripture is one undivided unit from Genesis to Christ’s Words, from Christ’s words to Revelation. Thus Vos can say, “He(Christ) has nowhere isolated Himself from His interpreters, but on the contrary identified them with Himself, both as to absoluteness of authority and adequacy of knowledge imparted (Luke 24:44; John 16:12-15)”. That is to say Jesus identifies His revelation to that of those who preceded and proceeded Himself.

Vos’ gives crucial insight into the revelation set forth by the Apostles, that they are as of equal import to the “red letters”, his own words (and in agreement with them) , ” (t)he relation between Jesus and the Apostolate is in general that between the fact to be interpreted and the subsequent interpretation of the fact.”

Vos goes on to say somewhat boldly, “Jesus task interweaves and accompanies the creation of the facts with a preliminary illumination of them, for by the side of His work stands His teaching. Only the teaching is more sporadic and less comprehensive than that supplied by the Epistles.” Vos actually argues that in some sense the teaching in the Epistles is actually more comprehensive than that of Jesus own words! It could be noted that the Epistles don’t contain parables and are not so much historical narratives. But more importantly they interpret the the historical death and resurrection of Christ and how it accomplishes the redemption of His people. The Epistles expound soteriology, if you will. This is the great “fact” or “work” of God in Christ to be expounded by the Apostles. Vos may also be alluding to the miracles of Christ as the “works” that stand by His teaching but even they are physical teachings of the spiritual healing and redemption that Christs death will accomplish.

So whether classical Protestant Liberals or Emergent folk say, “I just focus on the words of Jesus”, I would have to say with Vos, “Jesus does not represent Himself anywhere as being by his human earthly activity the exhaustive expounder of truth. Much rather He is the great fact to be expounded.”

Trust Not In Yourselves But In God Alone

Posted by Joseph Randall on September 13th, 2008
Some would tell us justification by faith alone apart from works is not fundamentally about how sinners who are trusting in themselves are made righteous before a Holy God by trusting in God alone. I wonder if those who argue this really understand the depths of the wickedness of the human heart?

I was struck by Paul’s words in 2 Corinthians 1:8-9 today:

“For we do not want you to be ignorant, brethren, of our trouble which came to us in Asia: that we were burdened beyond measure, above strength, so that we despaired even of life. Yes, we had the sentence of death in ourselves, that we should not trust in ourselves but in God who raises the dead . . . .”

This is truly amazing! Think about it. The great Apostle Paul who had such a powerful encounter with the Living Christ; who was powerfully converted to Christ; who lived such an exemplary life that he told the Corinthians to imitate him as he imitated Christ; who wrote a large portion of the New Testament; who was persecuted and suffered so much for the sake of the Gospel – - this highest caliber of godly Christian man still desperately needed God to so work in his life circumstances so that he would despair of life and not trust in himself, but in God! Oh how even the best of men are prone to trust in themselves instead of in God alone!

This temptation to trust in ourselves or in our own righteousness is not new to the human heart.
It was true in Israel’s infancy:

Deuteronomy 9:4: Do not think in your heart, after the LORD your God has cast them out before you, saying, “Because of my righteousness the LORD has brought me in to possess this land . . . .”

It was true in Daniel’s day:

Daniel 9:18: O my God, incline Your ear and hear; open Your eyes and see our desolations, and the city which is called by Your name; for we do not present our supplications before You because of our righteous deeds, but because of Your great mercies.

It was true in Jesus’ day:

Luke 18:9: Also He [Jesus] spoke this parable to some who trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and despised others . . .

And it was true in Paul’s day:

Philippians 3:8-9: Yet indeed I also count all things loss for the excellence of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord, for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and count them as rubbish, that I may gain Christ and be found in Him, not having my own righteousness, which is from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which is from God by faith . . . .

Do you realize the proneness of your own heart to trust in yourself and not in God alone?

If the great Apostle Paul needed to be placed in situations by God’s sovereign hand to cause him to despair even of life itself so that he would not trust in himself, but in God alone, how much more vigilant ought we be to make sure we too are turning from all that is in ourselves, and resting in God alone through our Lord Jesus Christ? May our only boast be in Him and in His glorious cross! And may this free us to live radical lives for the glory of God alone, just like our brother Paul!

Galatians 6:14: But far be it from me to boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world.

The Wonder of Jesus In the World

Posted by Nicholas T. Batzig on September 10th, 2008

Robert Law once noted the wonder that Jesus must have experienced, as the God-Man, living in a created world, full of glory and splendor together with sin and corruption:

Though little is directly reported of it in the Gospels, this [i.e. this idea of the wonder of Jesus] also belonged to the perfection of our Lord Jesus. No one has ever lived in such a marvelous world as He, to whom “the glory of the grass and splendor of the flower” continually revealed the diviner miracle of a Heavenly Father’s munificent love and care. No one ever felt as He did the wonder of God–the infinite majesty and the infinite tenderness, the infinite purity and infinite forgiveness of God. No one has ever felt as He did the wonder of man, of the human soul with its heights and depths, its heroisms of love and loyalty, virtue and self-sacrifice, its marvels too of baseness and ingratitude–the amazingness of sin.1

[1] Robert Law The Emotions of Jesus (Stoke-On-Trent, Staffs: Tentmaker, 1995) p. 58.

A few weeks ago I preached a sermon on Ephesians 1:7-10. The end of verse 10 says that Jesus came to reconcile all things in Heaven and on Earth. The really astonishing thing about this statement is the great difference between sinless, pure, and spotless Heaven and fallen, corrupt, defiled Earth. Everything in Heaven is holy and without corruption, everything on Earth is evil and corrupted. But in Christ, these seemingly irreconcilable spheres are reconciled. Jesus Christ, by His blood redeems a people for Himself. But He also redeems creation (the non-elect excepted) by that blood. One day Heaven will meet Earth and the saints will dwell with Christ in Heaven and on the New Earth. In an attempt to illustrate the seeming impossibility of this kind of reconciliation I made reference to a commercial I had seen the week before–a commercial presented by a group that claimed to be able to reconcile seemingly irreconcilable groups in this life. While the groups in this video will most likely never be reconciled, the things in Heaven and the things on Earth (which are antithetical) will be on account of the death of Christ. Watch and commercial below and see what you think.

Today I am preaching at the wedding of a good friend. The text I am planning to preach is John 3:22-31–John the Baptist’s declaration about the supreme excellence of Jesus Christ as the Bridegroom. As I was preparing this sermon, and thinking through the context of John’s Gospel, two things struck me. First, Jesus had just recently manifested His glory, by performing His first miracle, at a wedding of all places. This seems to be significant in regard to John’s statement about Jesus being the true Bridegroom. Iain Campbell, in his excellent article Union with the Bridegroom notes:
Jesus remained celibate all his life, in spite of the fact that the Old Testament never insisted on celibacy as a requirement for prophetic ministry. On the contrary, Hosea’s marriage, for example, was an integral part of the prophetic revelation through him. Yet marriage figures prominently in the sayings and parables of Jesus, with parables such as that of the wedding feast (Matthew 22:1-14) and the ten virgins (Matthew 25:1-13) drawing on social convention. Especially in the latter, the appearance of the bridegroom is the heart of the analogy, paralleling the second coming of Jesus himself.

More than that, John the Baptist explicitly describes himself as the bridegroom’s friend (John 3:29). The celibate Baptist rejoices in the voice of his celibate Saviour, whom he names as both Lamb of God (John 1:29, 36) and bridegroom. In between, Jesus displays his glory by performing his first miracle at a wedding (John 2:1-11).

These are not incidental references, particularly since John will draw on this marriage theme richly as the New Testament canon moves towards the denouement of the redemptive history. Indeed, it is singularly interesting that in the writings of John, Jesus’s glory is displayed first at a wedding, and finally at a wedding, at the marriage supper of the Lamb.

The second thing I thought about was the way in which John speaks of Jesus in relation to His people in the fourth Gospel. The apostle refers to himself, time and time again, as “the disciple whom Jesus loved.” Far from establishing some kind of exclusive relationship with Jesus by the use of this title, John classifies himself as he does others who belong to Jesus. At the introduction of the account of the death and resurrection of Lazarus John writes, “Now Jesus loved Martha, and her sister, and Lazarus.” Just before this statement John explains that “the sisters sent to Him [Jesus] saying, “Lord, behold, he whom you love is sick.” Mary and Martha appealed to the love of Jesus for their brother. The apostle John then appeals to Jesus’ love for Mary, Martha, and Lazarus. Finally, at the introduction of the Upper Room discourse in john 13, John writes, “Now before the feast of passover, when Jesus knew His hour had come that He should depart from the world to the Father, having loved his own who were in the world, He loved them to the end.

Jesus Christ loves each and everyone of His people. He loved them in eternity and He loved them to the end–even to the point of death on the cross. He continues to love them and will be their Bridegroom for all eternity. Whenever we are tempted to look at others who seem to have a deeper, loving relationship with the Lord we should remember what Jesus said to Peter as he asked what would happen to “the disciples whom Jesus loved” who had leaned on Jesus’ breast. Jesus did not tell Peter that He loved John more. He turned to Peter and said, “you follow me.” We need to remember that each and every believer make up the Bride of Christ, and therefore, each and every believer is loved by Him, and called to follow after Him. When you start to wonder if He loves others more than, remember what John said about Mary, Martha and Lazarus; remember that Jesus “loved His own who were in the world and He loved them to the end;” and remember that “He who has the Bride is the Bridegroom.”

Jesus A Performer?

Posted by Nicholas T. Batzig on July 14th, 2008

Yesterday, between a nursing home service and the evening worship service, I dipped into John Piper’s little book When The Darkness Will Not Lift. I am impressed with Dr. Piper’s treatment of the problem of depression (or melancholy). One of the foundational truths that Dr. Piper reminds readers of, in an effort to address the all too real problem of depression, is the fact of justification by faith. But to battle the deep shroud of depression, Piper further reminds us that Jesus does not just take upon himself our sin but he also provides us with our righteousness. In fact, he is our performer! This struck a note with my wife and a few of the folk in my congregation. I have taught that necessity of the imputation of Christ’s active obedience to the believer by faith. But this way of framing it clicked. Here is how Dr. Piper frames it:
To make a way for us to be saved, God sent Christ to live a perfect divine-human life, and die an obedient death. In this way Christ became both the substitute punishment for our sins (Matt. 26:28; 1 Cor. 15:3; 1 Pet. 3:18) and the substitute performer of our righteousness (Rom. 5:19; 10:4; 2 Cor. 5:21; Phil. 3:9) (15, emphasis added)

So, to put it in other words, Jesus Christ led an obedient life not only for himself (that is, to fit him to be a perfect sacrifice only) but also for all of us who embrace him by faith and are united to him. Jesus Christ is a public person or covenant representative (i.e., federal head) so that what he did to obey the law he did for us and in our place. So Christ both took our place in obeying his Father and keeping the law as the only sinless human being who ever lived and he took upon himself the divine punishment we who have trusted in him so richly deserve. It is the whole work of Christ that is a benefit to us who are united to Christ by faith. So yes, Jesus is a performer. He is my performer and I pray he is yours too.

One final thought. This fact, that Christ is a perfect substitute sacrifice and perfect substitute performer of the law does not undermine our call to a new obedience. In other words, there is a very dangerous error that sometimes floats around that affirming that Christ is our perfect performer undermines the pursuit of holiness. Not so. If Christ’s active obedience to the law has not been imputed to us by faith, then we end up having to provide our own obedience or sincerity of faith in the transaction of justitication.

To put it another way, some think that the assurance of salvation (which is a blessing that results from our awareness of the fact that Christ is our perfect substitute sacrifice and perfect performer of obedience) undermines our desire to pursue holiness. Nonsense! When we are united to Christ by faith we are united to the sinless, holy Son. It is that fact that serves as the basis for calls to obedience (see Paul in Col. 3:1-17). Truth be told, if we fail to realize that Christ is all that we need for salvation, then we put ourselves on the treadmill of trying to please God with our own performance. And that will land us in a slough of despond.

* John Piper’s When the Darkness Will Not Lift: Doing What We Can While We Wait For God -and Joy was published in 2006 by Crossway Books of Wheaton, Illinois.

I have been wanting to post a link to the sermon that Derek Thomas preached at the 2008 Twin Lakes Fellowship for some time now. Dr. Thomas preached about the temptation of Jesus in the wilderness. This message was a model of biblical theological preaching. While I greatly appreciate this model I do want to note that it is not the only model of preaching. In fact, Derek Thomas’ sermons are not always like this. Sometimes, our Reformed applicatory preaching needs to be tempered with a biblico-theological emphasis. This is not always an easy balance, but it is one that we need to strive for.

You can download the sermon here.

Warfield on the Lamb of God

Posted by Nicholas T. Batzig on July 11th, 2008
Recently I have been working through Warfield’s volume of sermons The Saviour of the World. As I was re-reading several sermons that were recommended to me in seminary, I understood once again why these were recommended. Warfield had a depth of theological insight that is unsurpassed among most modern pastors and theologians. In his sermon “The Lamb of God,” Warfield reflected on John the Baptist’s declaration, “Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world,” and on the Baptist’s role in relation to Jesus:
In both alike [i.e. the Synoptic Gospels and the Gospel of John] , the Baptist is purely the forerunner of the Lord, whose whole work consisted in making ready for the Lord’s coming. But the attention of the other evangelists is directed to the pathway prepared for the feet of the Lord; John’s is focused on the figure advancing over the road. They [i.e. Matthew, Mark and Luke] tell us, therefore, of the trumpet call to repentance which the Baptist sent ringing through the land, of his searching inquisition into the hearts of men, of his unsparing rebuke of evil whether in high places or low, of his flaming proclamation of judgment; John tells us rather of the testimony of the Baptist to Christ. From them [i.e. the synoptic Gospels] we learn accordingly what the Baptist thought of man; from John, what he thought of Christ.

A little later Warfield noted:

It is therefore that he lays such stress on the testimony of the Baptist to Jesus. Even from the reports of the Baptist’s teaching given in the other evangelists, we may perceive that he saw in Jesus a person, and expected of Him a work, which marked Him out as the divine Saviour of the world. What is thus implicit in their report [i.e. in the report of the three synoptic Gospels], however, is made explicit in John’s.

Warfield is suggesting the intimate connection between the Person and Work of Christ as it is taught by the apostle John. What the other Gospel writers intimate through their accounts ,John makes explicit in his when he recalls the day that John the Baptist stood before him and pointing at Jesus said, “Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.” John the Baptist points to a Man who was “the Lamb of God.” The Man Christ Jesus would be the Lamb slain. His incarnation was bound up in the work He came to do. What a Savior!

Warfield on the Lamb of God

Posted by Nicholas T. Batzig on July 11th, 2008
Recently I have been working through Warfield’s volume of sermons The Saviour of the World. As I was re-reading several sermons that were recommended to me in seminary, I understood once again why these were recommended. Warfield had a depth of theological insight that is unsurpassed among most modern pastors and theologians. In his sermon “The Lamb of God,” Warfield reflected on John the Baptist’s declaration, “Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world,” and on the Baptist’s role in relation to Jesus:
In both alike [i.e. the Synoptic Gospels and the Gospel of John] , the Baptist is purely the forerunner of the Lord, whose whole work consisted in making ready for the Lord’s coming. But the attention of the other evangelists is directed to the pathway prepared for the feet of the Lord; John’s is focused on the figure advancing over the road. They [i.e. Matthew, Mark and Luke] tell us, therefore, of the trumpet call to repentance which the Baptist sent ringing through the land, of his searching inquisition into the hearts of men, of his unsparing rebuke of evil whether in high places or low, of his flaming proclamation of judgment; John tells us rather of the testimony of the Baptist to Christ. From them [i.e. the synoptic Gospels] we learn accordingly what the Baptist thought of man; from John, what he thought of Christ.

A little later Warfield noted:

It is therefore that he lays such stress on the testimony of the Baptist to Jesus. Even from the reports of the Baptist’s teaching given in the other evangelists, we may perceive that he saw in Jesus a person, and expected of Him a work, which marked Him out as the divine Saviour of the world. What is thus implicit in their report [i.e. in the report of the three synoptic Gospels], however, is made explicit in John’s.

Warfield is suggesting the intimate connection between the Person and Work of Christ as it is taught by the apostle John. What the other Gospel writers intimate through their accounts ,John makes explicit in his when he recalls the day that John the Baptist stood before him and pointing at Jesus said, “Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.” John the Baptist points to a Man who was “the Lamb of God.” The Man Christ Jesus would be the Lamb slain. His incarnation was bound up in the work He came to do. What a Savior!

The next time you feel like GOD can’t use you, just remember…

Noah was a drunk

Abraham was too old

Isaac was a daydreamer

Jacob was a liar

Leah was ugly

Joseph was abused

Moses had a stuttering problem

Gideon was afraid

Samson had long hair and was a womanizer

Jeremiah and Timothy were too young

David had an affair and was a murderer

Elijah was suicidal

Isaiah preached naked

Jonah ran from God

Naomi was a widow

Job went bankrupt

Peter denied Christ

The Disciples fell asleep while praying

Martha worried about everything

The Samaritan woman was divorced, more than once

Zaccheus was too small

Paul was too religious

Timothy had an ulcer…

AND

Lazarus was dead!

Jesus helped them all!

I don’t know who wrote this but its a good reminder of our need for the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ.

In his Unpublished Essay on the Trinity Jonathan Edwards provides one of the strongest arguments for the notion that Christ is the “wisdom of God.” He wrote:

But that the Son of God is God’s own eternal and perfect idea is a thing we have yet much more expressly revealed in God’s Word. First, in that Christ is called “the wisdom of God.” If we are taught in the Scripture that Christ is the same with God’s wisdom or knowledge, then it teaches us that He is the same with God’s perfect and eternal idea. They are the same as we have already observed and I suppose none will deny. But Christ is said to be the wisdom of God (I Cor. 1:24, Luke 11:49, compare with Matt. 23:34); and how much doth Christ speak in Proverbs under the name of Wisdom especially in the 8th chapter.

While some might take issue with Edwards language of the Son of God being “God’s own eternal and perfect idea” his scripture proofs for Christ being the wisdom of God can hardly be disputed. In Luke 11:49-51 we read, “Therefore also the Wisdom of God said, ‘I will send them prophets and apostles, some of whom they will kill and persecute,’ so that the blood of all the prophets, shed from the foundation of the world, may be charged against this generation, from the blood of Abel to the blood of Zechariah, who perished between the altar and the sanctuary. Yes, I tell you, it will be required of this generation.” In Matthew 23:34-35 we read, “Therefore I send you prophets and wise men and scribes, some of whom you will kill and crucify, and some you will flog in your synagogues and persecute from town to town, so that on you may come all the righteous blood shed on earth, from the blood of innocent Abel to the blood of Zechariah the son of Barachiah, whom you murdered between the sanctuary and the altar.

The Lord Jesus is speaking in both of these accounts. He is tying the past history of the Jewish leaders to the present, with regard to their killing the ministers of the word of God. In Luke’s account Jesus says, “The wisdom of God said, ‘I will send them’” and in Matthews account Jesus says, “I send you prophets, wise men and scribes..” It is fairly straightforward that Jesus is calling Himself the wisdom of God in this passage.

Of course we are all comfortable saying that in Christ are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge, but are we as comfortable calling Jesus the wisdom of God. It seems that the other text Edwards provides gives further support to this idea. In 1 Corinthians 1:22-24 we read, “For Jews demand signs and Greeks seek wisdom, but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles, but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. ” Here the Holy Spirit indicates that Christ is the power of God and the wisdom of God. It was in the incarnation and the work of redemption that Christ “has become to us wisdom from God…” Do we think of Him this way? Do our lives in the workplace, at home, and in our conversations reflect that we believe Jesus Christ to be the wisdom of God? If we want wisdom and knowledge we must see that He is that to us in His death, burial and resurrection. If anyone lacks wisdom let him ask of God who gives liberally and without reproach and it will be given to him. But let him ask in faith.

Anyone who is familiar with the sermons of Jonathan Edwards will have noted the way in which he constantly appeals to the infinite nature of God and the bearing it has on the sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Anselm was the one who really stressed the fact that one sin against an infinitely holy God deserved infinite punishment. This is precisely what Edwards develops in his sermons when he preaches about the cross. In a sermon entitled Life Through Christ Alone he wrote:
In several respects eternal life in communicated by Christ. 1. He bought it for us. If we had not sinned, God would have given us eternal life upon the account of our obedience. But by our sin we lost it and Christ alone can redeem it, seeing divine justice must be satisfied and it would not have been just with God to let sin go unpunished. Christ so loved the offender that, rather than he should die, He would pay all that justice demanded, and [that] he has done so that justice is paid and everlasting life purchased and is to be received, without any money or price, by those who will come to Christ for it.

In a footnote to this paragraph he notes:

Eternal life was not bought by silver and gold, and such corruptible things, but by the precious blood of the Son of God (1 Peter 1:18). Christ’s life went for ours. So great a thing as eternal life, so infinite a blessing, was not purchased by anything but that which in God’s sight was of infinite value, even the blood and obedience of his own and only Son.

You can see how the notion of the infinite bears on Edwards theology. The infinite God promises to give us Himself in the Covenant of Grace. But since we deserve the infinite wrath of God (which is why hell will be for all eternity) it takes an infinite being to give an infinite blessing. It takes an infinite being to save us from our sins that deserve infinite punishment. This is why the eternal Son of God had to save us. When Jesus died on the cross an infinite being (God manifest in the flesh) suffered the wrath of the infinite God. And Jesus was called “the Beloved” because He was infinitely loved of the Father. It took one who was infinitely lovely to save those who were infinitely hated by a holy and righteous God (see Edwards on “The Wisdom of God Displayed to the Angels” for a development of this thought).

I wonder if the lack of teaching on this in our own day is the cause of many heresies in the church. It seems likely that this is one of the reasons that many former protestants have become Jehovah’s Witnesses. The rejection of this, or the ignorance of it, probably plays into how men can downplay the work of Christ in favor of bringing our works to bear on some future justification. If we deserve infinite punishment for sin, then how can we ever think that we bring anything to God for our salvation. It would be the highest insult for a poor man, indebted to the wealthiest man in the world, to bring a penny to him trying to gain a place in the rich man’s house. Praise be to the infinite God for the unsearchable riches of Christ. May we come to know more of what we have in so great a Savior.

Anyone who is familiar with the sermons of Jonathan Edwards will have noted the way in which he constantly appeals to the infinite nature of God and the bearing it has on the sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Anselm was the one who really stressed the fact that one sin against an infinitely holy God deserved infinite punishment. This is precisely what Edwards develops in his sermons when he preaches about the cross. In a sermon entitled Life Through Christ Alone he wrote:
In several respects eternal life in communicated by Christ. 1. He bought it for us. If we had not sinned, God would have given us eternal life upon the account of our obedience. But by our sin we lost it and Christ alone can redeem it, seeing divine justice must be satisfied and it would not have been just with God to let sin go unpunished. Christ so loved the offender that, rather than he should die, He would pay all that justice demanded, and [that] he has done so that justice is paid and everlasting life purchased and is to be received, without any money or price, by those who will come to Christ for it.

In a footnote to this paragraph he notes:

Eternal life was not bought by silver and gold, and such corruptible things, but by the precious blood of the Son of God (1 Peter 1:18). Christ’s life went for ours. So great a thing as eternal life, so infinite a blessing, was not purchased by anything but that which in God’s sight was of infinite value, even the blood and obedience of his own and only Son.

You can see how the notion of the infinite bears on Edwards theology. The infinite God promises to give us Himself in the Covenant of Grace. But since we deserve the infinite wrath of God (which is why hell will be for all eternity) it takes an infinite being to give an infinite blessing. It takes an infinite being to save us from our sins that deserve infinite punishment. This is why the eternal Son of God had to save us. When Jesus died on the cross an infinite being (God manifest in the flesh) suffered the wrath of the infinite God. And Jesus was called “the Beloved” because He was infinitely loved of the Father. It took one who was infinitely lovely to save those who were infinitely hated by a holy and righteous God (see Edwards on “The Wisdom of God Displayed to the Angels” for a development of this thought).

I wonder if the lack of teaching on this in our own day is the cause of many heresies in the church. It seems likely that this is one of the reasons that many former protestants have become Jehovah’s Witnesses. The rejection of this, or the ignorance of it, probably plays into how men can downplay the work of Christ in favor of bringing our works to bear on some future justification. If we deserve infinite punishment for sin, then how can we ever think that we bring anything to God for our salvation. It would be the highest insult for a poor man, indebted to the wealthiest man in the world, to bring a penny to him trying to gain a place in the rich man’s house. Praise be to the infinite God for the unsearchable riches of Christ. May we come to know more of what we have in so great a Savior.

Joel Beeke recently delivered this lecture on Christ Centered Preaching.

Ligonier Ministries has posted two articles by John Gerstner on Jesus being the God-Man, on their blog. You can find the first part here. You can find the second part here. The third part can be viewed here.

Ligonier Ministries has posted two articles by John Gerstner on Jesus being the God-Man, on their blog. You can find the first part here. You can find the second part here. The third part can be viewed here.

C.J. Mahaney and Sovereign Grace have started a new blog. It looks like it will be spiritually beneficial. For those of you who do not know who C.J. is, here are some helpful links. C.J. is best known for his passion to preach the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ. He has been influential in my life in reminding me of the centrality of the cross. You will see something of this in the most recent post he has on “cross-centered books.” You can access his post on Cross-centered books here. The blog itself can be found here.

C.J. Mahaney and Sovereign Grace have started a new blog. It looks like it will be spiritually beneficial. For those of you who do not know who C.J. is, here are some helpful links. C.J. is best known for his passion to preach the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ. He has been influential in my life in reminding me of the centrality of the cross. You will see something of this in the most recent post he has on “cross-centered books.” You can access his post on Cross-centered books here. The blog itself can be found here.

Realizing that it’s been a while since I’ve recommended any books, I wanted to point out one of my all time favorites. I can’t believe that I missed this book when I started posting the series Of Making of Many Books There is No End Recommendation. I cannot recommend strongly enough William G. Blaikie and Robert Law’s Glimpses of the Inner Life of our Lord & The Emotions of Jesus. With the exception of perhaps B.B. Warfield’s The Emotional Life of our Lord, there is no better book that I know of on the subject than this one. Tentmaker Publications has reprinted the work by Blaikie and the work by Law together in one very nice edition. You can order a copy here. You can also download a PDF version of Blaikie’s work here. These works are of inestimable benefit for the Christian who wants to know his/her Savior more. I especially liked Blaikie’s chapters on, “His Entire Harmony with the Father,” “His Temptation by the Devil,” “His Enduring of the Cross,” and “His Dying Word.” My favorite chapters out of The Emotions of Jesus were: “The Compassion of Jesus (for the suffering),” “The Compassion of Jesus (for the sinful),” and “The Wonder of Jesus.” If you read this work I think you will agree that every chapter is like a wonderful work of art–showing us the beauty of Christ on every page.